Welcome to all our free subscribers. What will be shared today  are free alpha from our Economics Design's researchers.

Introduction

What we have been noticing

The world of gaming has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, thanks to the emergence of Web 3 and blockchain technology. One of the most notable changes has been the evolution of game economies, which have shifted from traditional models based on labour theory of value to new models based on utility and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). This intersection of traditional economics and Web 3 game economy design has significant implications for both fields, with the potential to transform the gaming industry and challenge long-standing economic theories. In this article, we will explore the intersection of traditional economics and Web 3 game economy design, and examine the ways in which these two fields are shaping the future of gaming and economic theory.

Key topics this article will cover:

What is Web 3 Gaming in a nutshell?
Intersection of traditional economics and Web 3 game economy
Pros and cons of integrating cryptocurrency into gaming
Key takeaways of Web 3 game economy from traditional economics
Conclusion

What is Web 3 Gaming in a nutshell?

Web 3 gaming refers to the use of blockchain technology and decentralised networks to create games that have new economic models and features. In simple terms, Web 3 games use digital assets (such as NFTs) to represent in-game items or currency, which can be bought, sold, and traded on the blockchain. This creates a new level of ownership and value for players, as they can truly own and control their in-game assets outside of the game environment. Additionally, Web 3 games often incorporate features such as community governance, where players can participate in decision-making processes for the game, and decentralised systems that allow for more secure and transparent gameplay.

Overall, Web 3 gaming offers a new way to create and interact with digital games, with economic models and features that were not possible before the emergence of blockchain technology. According to reportlinker, the global blockchain gaming market is projected to grow from USD 4.6 billion in 2022 to USD 65.7 billion by 2027 at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 70.3% during the forecast period. One of the factors driving the market growth is rising funding for blockchain games.

Intersection of traditional economics and Web 3 game economy design

Traditional Economics

Traditional economics is based on the principle of scarcity: resources are finite, and human wants and needs are infinite. This means that there will always be more demand for goods and services than there is supply, which creates a market where prices are set by supply and demand. In traditional economics, the value of a good or service is determined by the amount of resources that go into producing it. This is known as the labour theory of value, and it has been the foundation of economic theory for centuries.

Web 3 Game Economy Design

Web 3 game economy design takes a different approach to economics. Rather than relying on the labour theory of value, Web 3 game economies are based on the concept of utility. In other words, the value of a good or service is determined by how useful it is to the user. Web 3 game economies also rely on the use of NFTs, which allows the creation of true digital ownership. In traditional games, players may own in-game items, but they don’t have true ownership of them. If the game shuts down or the player loses their account, they lose everything they have invested in the game. With NFTs, players have true ownership of their assets, and they can take them with them to other games or even sell them for real-world money.

Traditional Economics and Web 3 Game Economy

The intersection of traditional economics and Web 3 game economy design has significant implications for both fields. Traditional economics has long relied on the labour theory of value, but Web 3 game economy design shows that the concept of utility is just as important in determining the value of goods and services. Web 3 game economy design also challenges traditional economic theories around ownership and scarcity. With NFTs, players have true ownership of their assets, which creates new opportunities for economic exchange and value creation.

Furthermore, Web 3 game economy design has the potential to transform the gaming industry. In traditional games, the game developer owns all of the assets in the game. With Web 3 game economy design, players have a stake in the game economy, and game developers can create new revenue streams by selling NFTs or taking a percentage of the profits from NFT sales.

Pros and cons of integrating cryptocurrency into gaming

Pros:

Increased Revenue: Incorporating cryptocurrency into games can increase revenue through cryptocurrency transactions and purchases.
Security: Cryptocurrency provides increased security for both players and developers, as it is a decentralised and secure way to make transactions.
Ownership: Cryptocurrency enables true ownership of in-game assets, allowing players to own and control their in-game assets outside of the game environment.
Transparency: Cryptocurrency transactions are transparent and recorded on a public blockchain ledger, making them more secure and transparent compared to traditional payment methods.

Cons:

Complexity: Cryptocurrency is still a relatively new technology, and some players may find it challenging to understand and use.
Volatility: Cryptocurrency is subject to price volatility, which can lead to fluctuations in the value of in-game assets and currency.
Regulation: Cryptocurrency is not yet regulated in many countries, leading to uncertainty around its legality and use.
Accessibility: Not all players may have access to cryptocurrency, creating a potential barrier to entry for some players.
Energy Consumption: Some cryptocurrencies require a lot of energy to process transactions, which could be a concern for environmentally conscious players and developers.

In summary, incorporating cryptocurrency into games offers benefits such as increased revenue, security, ownership, and transparency, but it also has potential drawbacks, such as complexity, volatility, regulation, accessibility, and environmental concerns. Developers need to weigh these pros and cons carefully and consider the potential impact on their player base before integrating cryptocurrency into their games.

Key takeaways of Web 3 game economy from traditional economics

Web 3 game economy can take away several key insights from traditional economics. Here are some of the key takeaways:

Scarcity and supply and demand: Traditional economics teaches us that scarcity drives value, and that the price of goods and services is determined by supply and demand. In the context of web 3 game economy, this means that in-game assets with limited supply are likely to have higher value, and that the price of these assets will be determined by the level of demand for them.
Incentives: Traditional economics also highlights the importance of incentives in shaping human behaviour. In the context of web 3 game economy, developers can use economic incentives to encourage desirable behaviours among players, such as contributing to the development of the game or participating in community governance.
Game theory: Game theory is an important concept in traditional economics, and it can also be applied to web 3 game economy design. Game theory can help developers understand how players will behave in response to different game mechanics and economic incentives, and can be used to create more engaging and rewarding gameplay experiences.
Market structures: Traditional economics teaches us about different types of market structures, such as monopolies and oligopolies, and how they can impact market outcomes. In the context of web 3 game economy, understanding market structures can help developers design more competitive and fair marketplaces for in-game assets and currencies.
Behavioural economics: Finally, traditional economics has increasingly incorporated insights from behavioural economics, which looks at how cognitive biases and heuristics impact decision-making. In the context of web 3 game economy, understanding these biases can help developers create more effective economic incentives and better engage players.

Traditional economics provides several key insights that can be applied to web 3 game economy design, including scarcity, supply and demand, incentives, game theory, market structures, and behavioural economics. By applying these insights, developers can create more engaging and rewarding gameplay experiences for players while also driving economic value for themselves.

Conclusion

The integration of traditional economics and Web 3 gaming has the potential to revolutionise the gaming industry. The emergence of in-game token economies, player-driven marketplaces, and decentralised gaming ecosystems is transforming the way players interact with games and game developers. The potential for monetization of in-game assets and the creation of a new type of player-driven profession opens up new possibilities for the gaming industry. It will be interesting to see how the industry continues to evolve as these new technologies and economic models become more prevalent.

Watch the video below to learn more about the intersection economics and web 3 gaming. Don’t forget to like and subscribe so you don’t miss out on important updates and our newly uploaded videos.